Jonathan Not Needed In Court To Effectively Prosecute Metuh, Says EFCC

Must Read

Ifeanyi Ubah Appeals Against Judgement Sacking Him From Senate

Senator Ifeanyi Ubah has revealed that he has appealed against the judgement of a Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Bwari,...

Fani-Kayode Warns Miyetti Allah Over Comment On Amotekun

Former minister of aviation, Femi Fani-Kayode has warned the Miyetti Allah group over its continued pronouncements on the establishment...

PDP: Presidency Mounting Pressure On S’Court To Deliver Sokoto, Bauchi, Adamawa In APC’s Favour

  Uche Secondus, national chairman of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), has accused the presidency of mounting pressure on the...

Amotekun, Deliberate Plot Against Fulani: Miyetti Allah

  The Miyetti Allah Kaute Hore says the regional southwest security outfit, Amotekun is a plot against the Fulan, and...

‘Armed’ Chicken Kills Man In A Cockfight In India

A 55-year-old man has lost his life during a cockfight in India. According to reports, the man died after a...
Ardent Reader, News Freak, Socio-Political Commentator, Archaeologist & Pro-Democrat.

OLISA METUHThe Economic and Financial Crimes commission (EFCC) on Tuesday said it could effectively prosecute the National Publicity Secretary of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), Olisa Metuh, without necessarily involving former President Goodluck Jonathan in the case.
The EFCC’s position was sequel to an argument by the PDP spokesman that since Jonathan was allegedly involved in the process leading to the payment of funds for his presidential campaign, he ought to have been invited as a witness in the case.
Metuh and his company, Destra Investment Limited, are currently standing trial before the Federal High Court in Abuja for allegedly receiving N400m from the office of the National Security Adviser (ONSA) for security services, which he allegedly diverted to fund the PDP’s activities.
The PDP spokesperson and his company are also accused of contravening the money laundering Act by making $2m suspicious investment.
At the conclusion of the prosecution’s witness last week, Metuh filed a no-case submission in court.
In the application, he argued among others, that the prosecution failed to make out a prima facie case against him by not inviting the ex-president as its witness.
The anti-graft agency, however, in a counter-submission, stated that it had conveniently made out a case against Metuh for which the court should direct him to enter defence.
According to the EFCC, Mr. Jonathan is not a necessary prosecution witness, adding that it had effectively built a case against the accused with the number of witnesses invited to testify in court.
It, therefore, urged the court to dismiss Metuh’s no-case argument.

- Advertisement -


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -