Why Uzodinma Was Declared Winner: Supreme Court

Must Read

Arsenal Defeats Everton In 5 Goals Thriller

Arsenal has defeated Everton 3-2 to move further up on the domestic league table after an evenly contested clash...

I Live In Fear Everyday- Peter Obi Raises Alarm

Peter Obi, the Peoples Democratic Party(PDP) Vice presidential candidate during the last general poll has stated that he constantly...

Why Buhari Won’t Endorse Tinubu’s 2023 Presidential Ambition: Yarima

Senator Ahmed Sani Yarima, former governor of Zamfara State and two-term senator has explained why President Buhari will not...

2023: Don’t Flee Nigeria For Tinubu, Razak Urges Bode George

Lanre Razak, a prominent member of the All Progressive Congress in Lagos State says it would be unfortunate if...

‘FBI Charged Me Illegally’ – Invictus Obinwanne Okeke

CEO of Invictus Group and Forbes-celebrated Nigerian man, Obinwanne Okeke, who is facing two counts of $11m computer and wire...

Jubiliation as S/court affirms Tambuwal, Ganduje election
Supreme Court

The Supreme Court says the result sheets produced by Hope Uzodinma of the All Progressives Congress in the March 9, 2019 governorship election in Imo State were admissible because the Independent National Electoral Commission didn’t counter them.

In a copy of the judgment released by the apex court on Thursday, it said the Court of Appeal and the election petition tribunal misread the pleadings by Uzodinma and APC in their dismissal of the petition and appeal.

The election of Emeka Ihedioha of the Peoples Democratic Party who polled 273,404, was annulled by the Supreme court last week, while Uzodinma who polled 96,458 votes was declared winner after his 213, 695 votes from 388 polling units were added to his total result.

Read Also: Uzodinma Describes PDP Protest As An Attempt To Overthrow Buhari

The Supreme Court maintained that the main issue by Uzodinma and APC was that votes due to them in 388 polling units were excluded, which if added, they would have emerged winners.

Justice Kudirate Kekere-Ekun, while delivering the lead judgement said while INEC alleged that the results pleaded by Uzodinma, through the police officer, were false, it did not call any witness and did not tender any documents to counter it.

“Having pleaded that the documents are false, the respondents made allegations of a criminal nature against the appellants. They were required to plead the specific elements of fraud and lead evidence showing genuine results. Not only must the allegations be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, but it must also be proved that the appellants personally committed or aided and abetted the commission of the crime or that they procured the commission of the crime through their agents or officials,” she said.

- Advertisement -
Ad ==> Discover how a young Nigerian graduate now makes a consistent 40k per week doing a legitimate online business. You too can start yours now, click here!!!

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -