The opinion of the south-west governors on recent operations at Magodo estate phase two, according to the Attorney-General of the Federation Abubakar Malami, is “unjustifiable.”
The governors of the south-west criticized Malami’s suspected role in the deployment of police personnel to Magodo estate in order to implement a supreme court judgment on Wednesday.
In a statement issued by Rotimi Akeredolu, the governors’ forum chairman said, “We condemn, in very clear terms, the role of the Attorney-General of the Federation, Mr Abubakar Malami, SAN, in this act of gross moral turpitude.”
The governors’ remarks came after a spat between Sanwo-Olu and a chief superintendent of police (CSP) over the invasion of Magodo Estate by Abuja policemen.
Responding to the south-west governors’ comment, Malami, in a statement by Umar Gwandu, his media aide, faulted the position of the governors, adding that the rule of law must be respected.
“The office of the attorney-general of the federation and minister of justice takes exception to the Southwest Governors unjustifiable insinuation of impunity against the office of the attorney-general over execution of a judgment of the supreme court,” the statement reads.
The press release came to us as a surprise. We see it as a vituperation of ulterior motives of some political class who derived pleasure in dragging the name of Malami in the mud to achieve some sinister objectives.
It is widely reported in the papers that the Lagos state Governor was quoted to have said ‘I’ve spoken extensively with the Inspector-General of Police and the Honourable Attorney-General, and we’ve resolved all the issues’.
“The office of the attorney-general of the federation and Minister of Justice would appreciate if the coalition of the governors will help to unravel the circumstances preventing the Lagos state government from enforcing the court order despite several attempts from 2012- 2015 and so-called settlement initiative started in 2016.
“Some of the cardinal pillars of democratic government are the doctrine of separation of powers and obedience to the rule of law inclusive of court orders.
“It is a common knowledge that execution of the judgment and orders of courts of competent jurisdiction, and the court of last resort in the circumstances remains a cardinal component of the rule of law.
“And the office of the Attorney General wonders how maintenance of the law and orders in the course of execution of the judgment of the supreme can be adjudged by imagination of the governors to be unruly.”