The imposition of fines and the forcible towing of vehicles owned by accused traffic offenders by agents of the Lagos State Traffic Management Authority (LASTMA), without a court order is now prohibited, according to a decision made by the Lagos State High Court in Ikeja.
The declaration was issued by Justice Olalekan Oresanya in the verdict in a lawsuit brought by attorney Lawal Aliyu against LASTMA, the Lagos State Government, and the state’s Attorney General.
Aliyu had filed the lawsuit to contest the N20,000 fine that LASTMA had imposed on him for a purported traffic violation and the additional N10,000 towage fee that the traffic enforcement agency had made him pay.
Justice Oresanya held that “Public authorities and bodies cannot act in a manner that is inconsistent and incompatible with the fundamental rights of citizens as guaranteed by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
“Even in the jurisdiction, where parliamentary laws/statutes are supreme, such as the United Kingdom, public bodies must not act in a manner that is incompatible with the convention and rights of citizens as embodied in the European Convention on Human Rights which has now been incorporated into the Human Rights Act 1998, the African Charter on Human and Peoples Right, being an equivalent of the ECHR, and which has now being codified into the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, 2004 being the equivalence law.”
Justice Oresanya narrowed down the issues in the matter to three and resolved all in favour of the applicant (Aliyu), relying on Sections 34, 36, and 41 of the 1999 Constitution (as amended), among others.
On issue one regarding the question of whether the obstruction, towage, seizure, and impoundment of the applicant’s car with Registration No. AGL 93 DW on November 23, 2021, by LASTMA was unlawful, the court ruled that from the available evidence, the respondents failed to establish any fact to justify their action and that there was no part of the Lagos State Traffic Management Law (2018) that permitted the derogation of the applicant’s right to freedom of movement.
On the second issue regarding the fine and towing fee imposed on the applicant, the court said a careful perusal of Section 27 (1) b, c, d and e of Traffic Management Law relied upon by the respondents revealed that LASTMA could not impose fine without arraigning an alleged traffic offender in court, adding that it amounted to ignoring fair hearing and being a judge in one’s case.
The court knocked LASTMA for the practice of forcefully towing vehicles of alleged traffic offenders, saying it was the height of oppression.
The judge held, “I must add that it is strange and bizarre that the 1st Respondent (LASTMA) towed a serviceable vehicle in good working condition and thereby caused damage to the vehicle in the process when it has not been established that the Applicant resisted the arrest of his vehicle, only for the 1st respondent to subsequently impose a fine on the applicant for a service not solicited by the applicant.
“To my mind, this is the height of oppression and impunity and it is condemnable.”
On issue three, as to whether the applicant was entitled to compensation and damages for breach of his fundamental rights, the court said having resolved issues one and two in favour of the applicant, it followed that the applicant was naturally entitled to damages in compensation.
“On the whole, I give judgment for the applicant in the following terms; I make a declaration that the obstruction, towage, seizure, and impoundment of the applicant’s car with Registration NO. AGL 93 DW on the 23rd November 2021 by the Respondents is unlawful, illegal, and unconstitutional as same amounted to gross violation of the Applicant’s fundamental right to freedom of movement enshrined in Section 41 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).
“I make a declaration that the imposition and enforcement of LASTMA fine in the sum of N20,000 and LASTMA towing fine in the sum of N10,000, on the applicant without an order of a court of competent jurisdiction is unlawful, illegal and is null and void and the said fines should be paid back by the respondents to the applicant.
The sum of N750,000 compensatory damages is awarded against the respondents for the violation of the applicant’s fundamental rights,” the court held.