Deep-Voiced Men Have Lower Spérm Counts-Study


Listen up, ladies: The deep timbre of a male voice may sound attractive, but low-voiced men actually tend to have lower sp^rm counts, a new study says. Multiple studies have found that women usually favor masculine features, such as prominent jaws, high muscle mass, and low-pitched voices.
The theory is that these traits signal a high-quality mate—for instance, it’s been proposed that masculine men generally have more robust amounts of sperm. But the new research revealed that, while deep voices are attractive to women, low-pitched men actually tended to have lower concentrations of sp^rm in their ejaculat^.The finding suggests that men who evolutionarily invest most of their energy into making themselves attractive to females may suffer deficiencies in other areas—in this case, sp^rm counts. For instance, the male hormone testosterone—which lowers voice pitch—can thwart sp^rm production.

Measuring Sp^rm Counts For the study, Simmons and colleagues recruited 54 heterosexual men and 30 heterosexual women from a college campus. The team recorded the voices of the male volunteers, then asked the female volunteers to rate the men’s voices in terms of attractiveness and masculinity. Not surprisingly, the women rated deep voices as most alluring. Each male volunteer then collected a semen sample “in the privacy of their own home and returned it to the lab for analysis,” Simmons said via email. The samples were entered into a computer-assisted sp^rm-analysis system, or its ability to swim toward its target, the egg—as well as the number of sp^rm in the semen. The analysis showed that men with more attractive voices did not have better sp^rm quality than those with less desirable voices. In fact, Simmons noted, the sp^rm from the deep-voiced men were “perfectly motile” and fertile—there were just fewer sp^rm cells in the ejaculate.

An overriding question in this kind of research is why characteristically masculine traits evolved in people. “In our evolutionary past, [masculine] men would have had greater reproductive success, leading to sexual dimorphism [differences between men and women] in voices, faces, bodies, etcetera,” “This is all very well researched in non-human animals—think of elk or peacocks. But we know less about our own evolutionary history.”

In fact, a woman’s preference for masculinity may be a byproduct of her interest in finding a dominant mate—someone who would offer the best protection for her and her family. The new study also fits into the idea that masculinity may have a role beyond attracting females, she added, a topic currently under investigation. “If masculine traits lead to higher dominance/status positions—even at the expense of some level of sp^rm quality—then the trade-off between masculine traits and fertility makes more sense,” she said.