![Pat Utomi](https://www.informationng.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/2019-why-nigeria-needs-a-movement-not-political-parties-pat-utomi.jpg)
Vice-President Yemi Osinbajo says some parts of the All Progressives Congress (APC) manifesto was written at the residence of Pat Utomi, a professor, in 2014.
Laolu Akande, senior special assistant to the vice-president on media and publicity, revealed that Osinbajo said this at the 5th edition of the Airtel Touching Lives in Lagos.
The vice-president was quoted as saying. “Listening to each story of a life touched this evening must remind us of the many others who need our help, our comfort and our kindness. The poor and vulnerable always need a voice. ”
“In 2014, Mr Wale Edun, Prof. Pat Utomi and I met at Pat’s home to write portions of the manifesto of the APC.
“We all agreed that a fundamental pillar of our party’s plans must be to create a social safety net for the people. We were convinced that government owed a duty to the poor, the weak, the vulnerable and those who cannot work.
Read Also: Nigeria’s VAT Is Low Compared To Other African Countries: Osinbajo
“Social safety nets are not merely acts of sovereign kindness; they are a sovereign obligation – a responsibility.”
“Today, the social safety net scheme is the fore of our Social Investment Programmes where we are feeding about 9.5 million children in public schools in 34 states across Nigeria; we are giving monthly cash to about nearly a million households as part of our conditional cash transfer scheme; we have given, as at the last count, 2.2 million loans to petty traders whose inventories are no more than N5, 000,” he said.
“We have also engaged about 500, 000 young men and women, who have been unemployed (over different periods of time) under our N-Power programme. But we are still very far from touching majority of those who need help.
“It is clear that to do so, we need far more resources behind that programme. This is why the work of social conscious companies like Airtel is so vital. Bridging the huge gap between what government can do and what is left to be done.”