Itse Sagay, chairman of the Presidential Advisory Committee Against Corruption (PACAC), has faulted the supreme court for not basing its judgement on the validity of the Osun state governorship rerun election.
Sagay said although, the Supreme court did well to have nullified the decision of the election tribunal, it should have ruled based on whether the decision of the Independent National Electoral Commission INEC was right to declare the poll inconclusive and subsequently held supplementary poll was accurate.
According to Sagay, disenfranchising voters based on electoral violence should be discouraged.
“The lesson should be drawn home to everybody that all members of the tribunal or the court should be present before they can take part in a judgment,” he said.
“When a judge has conducted a case 90 per cent, the judge that takes his place is not allowed to use the records, he has to start all over again. That is the point the Supreme Cous making here, and I think I support the decision.
“If there was violence or something was wrong and you are unable to vote, I don’t know why it is something wrong in being allowed, on another day, to vote… I think the Supreme Court should have just completed that so that the issue would not arise again.
“Ballot boxes have been carried away. Even if you voted, your result cannot count and then INEC decides according to its guidelines to repeat election in such a place, what is wrong with that?
“I think the Supreme Court should have pronounced on that so that you don’t have a situation where somebody would pre-judge the outcome of election by creating confusion in some areas where he is weak and then insisting that those people there should not have an opportunity to vote and then he wins by only allowing election in areas where he is strong; that is the whole idea of supplementary election so that everybody can have an opportunity. I think the Supreme Court should have made a pronouncement on that; whether it is right or wrong.”