Tribunal: Atiku’s 27 Witnesses Tendered Useless Evidences — Tinubu

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has said all 27 witnesses called by Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) failed to give “useful” evidence in the case against him at the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal.

Recall that Atiku is challenging the outcome of the February 25 presidential election and praying the court nullifies Tinubu’s victory, saying he is ‘not qualified’ to contest the poll.

Among several issues raised in the petition, Atiku and the PDP are alleging that the President was indicted for drug trafficking in the United States, that his academic certificates submitted to the electoral body were forged, and that he is a citizen of Guinea.

The petitioners also accused the Independent National Electoral Commission of manipulating the poll in favour of Tinubu.

The petitioners closed their case on June 23 after calling 27 witnesses.

However in the July 14 final written address, Tinubu through his lawyer, Wole Olanipekun, described the evidence given by all the 27 witnesses as “a panoply of hearsay, admissions against interest, and irrelevancies on the part of the petitioners.

“Without fear of contradiction, the petitioners have no single witness whose evidence could be described as useful or manageable to their case.”

According to Olanipekun, the sole witness he called was competent and able to discredit the case of the petitioners.

READ ALSOTribunal: APC’s Final Address Calculated To Intimidate Judiciary, Threaten National Peace – PDP

Information Nigeria understands that Senate Majority Leader, Opeyemi Bamidele, was the only witness called by the president.

“This witness demonstrated undoubted competence to testify in respect of the subjects submitted before the court, including issues surrounding the US proceedings, himself, being a US practising attorney and counsellor at law,

“Also, being a lawmaker, who participated in the enactment of the Electoral Act, 2022, he stated the position and intention of the legislature, particularly, as it relates to the appropriate mode of transmission as well as transfer and collation of results,” Olanipekun stated.

Based on the arguments and submissions contained in the final address, he prayed the court to “dismiss this petition as totally lacking in merit, substance and bona fide.”

“It has been glaringly shown and demonstrated by the presentation of the petition itself and the evidence presented by the petitioners, including the evidence of PW27, that the petition itself is not only frivolous but also amounts to a crass abuse of the process of court.

“Non-existent documents were being sourced and printed from the internet, among others, to be presented before this honourable court, after the filing of the petition, in furtherance of the abusive nature of the petition itself,” he added.